To create a sturdy, peaceful and orderly society drastically depends on the leadership that is definitely committed to strict transformational values that will advantage not only the existing society however also the future generations. Any leadership that continues to managed corruption alternatively of definitely fighting it can not assure the future of a country. In the preceding democratic regimes, Nigerian leaders have expressed their feelings more than the slow pace of improvement, unemployment, raise in crime price, terrible roads, terrible electrical energy and linked them to challenges of corruption which they would address in their governments. Just about every campaign centres on these challenges however in the end turns out not to address them.
In the imply time, Nigerians do not even know the appropriate particular person to elect at the apex leadership seat considering the fact that they look to be superior through campaigns however as soon as they get in the seat of energy, they turn out to be (evil) people today who do not operate for the interest of the suffering masses, however their personal selfish aims. At the moment, it appears that only the China's 'legalism' as a college of believed can operate in Nigerian society.
The philosophy of Legalism became pretty preferred in China through the Hundred Flower era. Followers of this college of believed argued that, 'human beings have been by nature evil and would follow the ideal order only if they are coerced by harsh laws and stiff punishments'. The legalists (also identified as College of Law) thought that only firm actions by the state can really bring about social order that can positively transform a state. This was against the Confucius college of believed which holds that "human nature was primarily superior and the universe has a moral code". The aspect of the legalists' view, that look to be extra relevant in this regard is that "human nature is primarily corrupt therefore, officials can not be trusted to carry out their duties in a fair manner, and only a robust ruler could construct an orderly society".
Following the current presidential debate for the April 2011 basic election, it seems that Nigeria is but to have a powerful leader that can actually transform the nation. All the aspirants spoke on similar or very same troubles bothering Nigerians with merely variations in the decision of words/language structure made use of in answering the inquiries. There was no traces of Obama in their words/speeches which certainly show lack of passion to genuinely transform Nigeria. Gen. Mohamadu Buhari, which several believe that, if come into energy, will transform the country with his undaunted nature of approaching troubles of corruption proved otherwise in the debate. His concern look to be far more on accountability and probe. In this way, it can be reasoned that he (Gen. Buhari) will devote 4 to eight years of his regime reviewing circumstances of corruption which have in no way taken Nigeria forward.
At this point, it can be assumed that Nigeria democracy is nonetheless crawling and not but on its feet. Nigeria, hence, wants a powerful will leader with a legalist approach, who will draw a line among old and new practices and move forward by facing the modern concerns for the advantage of Nigerians, but addressing difficulties of corruption below his regime, not with manipulative lawful implies yet also with firm hands. War Against Indiscipline (WAI), once introduced by Gen. Buhari, is just what Nigerians deserve from a leader. Not leaders who condone indiscipline of all sorts which have a tendency to be evident in financial backwardness of the country. Unless a leader with a legalist view handles and treat corrupt Nigerians with firm hands, Nigeria's developmental pace will not be distinct from the speed of a forest snail.
Verify: http://art-in-disguise.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment