Thursday, 24 December 2015

Conceptual Gaps in Philosophy: The Butterfly Conversation and Our Search for the Truth

Setting the Stage: Reality in the Eyes of the Butterfly

As we search for the truth (any truth, be it God, or the which means of life, or the reality of the universe), we, Mankind, need to stay humble. Why? Regardless of our considerable intellectual prowess, that intellect remains bounded by our temporal, 3 dimensional existence.

Allow me illustrate that limitation by means of a believed experiment. We commence with an Explorer in the deep jungle, exactly where the Explorer tends to make an astounding discovery, getting a Butterfly that is definitely one of a kind - the Butterfly can speak.

I will skip previous their introductions, and choose up the discussion as the Butterfly, understanding the far-reaching know-how of the Explorer, seeks answers to terrific inquiries that have confounded the Butterfly.

Butterfly: "Now, a further query, what do you know of the lights above us, these of the evening?"

Explorer: "Ah, the lights above. We get in touch with the smaller sized ones stars, the bigger ones planets and the biggest the moon."

Butterfly: "So you have studied the lights."

Explorer: "Yes, intensely, and in detail."

Butterfly: "So you have climbed the mountains to see the lights closer?"

The Explorer smiles to himself. "Even on the mountains you cannot see the lights closely. But we have sent a wonderful machine up into the dark evening."

Butterfly: "A machine?"

Explorer: "Yes, a machine, a good object of metal."

Butterfly: "Metal? I nevertheless never realize."

The Explorer now realizes the butterfly has never noticed a machine. The Explorer tries an analogy. "The machine is which includes an animal, including a good bird, grown to fly higher."

The Butterfly pauses, searching up: "High than the clouds."

Explorer: "Yes,

Butterfly: "Oh, you have astounding ability, to grow such an animal."

Explorer: "Yes, the bird was as huge as the greatest tree."

Butterfly: "And how far did its wings stretch?"

Explorer: "I will tell you it did not have wings."

Butterfly stops, motionless in apparent amazement: "How did it fly?"

Explorer responds quietly: "We employed fire such as a volcano to create it fly."

Butterfly, bowing as a butterfly: "Allow us give thanks to the god of the volcano, for this act of mercy."

Allow's pause. Why does the Explorer use such a convoluted analogy for a machine (for visualization allow Consider the "machine" is the Hubble Telescope launched on the Space Shuttle)? The butterfly has no expertise of machines. So the Butterfly has no ideas of "what a machine is such as" on which the Explorer could possibly construct a description.

Why would the Explorer not draw a image of a machine for the Butterfly? Not only does the Butterfly have no practical experience on which to fully grasp machines, the Butterfly has no encounter to comprehend the ideas on which the idea of machine rests.

Would the Butterfly have an understanding of that "steel, aluminum and titanium" have been applied to build the components, that "energy gear" shaped these components, that "electronics" permitted man to handle what the machine does, that "chemical reactions" turned "oil" into "plastic" that was "molded" into other components, and that "rocket fuel" creates "thrust" to propel the rocket.

The answer is no.

So the Explorer uses an analogy, that a machine is a big animal. The Explorer, once again wisely and for related motives, does not appropriate the Butterfly's belief that a god controls the volcanoes. If the ideas for machines are not in the lexicon of the Butterfly, the ideas for the geophysics of volcanoes are likely not either.

Enable's continue.

Butterfly: "I don't have an understanding of even though. If the fire of the volcano tends to make it fly, why never we see that volcano in the sky?"

Explorer: "Ah, yes. You are astute. You do not see the volcano, since the volcano turns off, and the good machine stays up such as the stars remain up."

Butterfly: "I see. The fantastic machine becomes element of the dome that holds the lights."

The Explorer contemplates correcting the Butterfly, with an explanation of "orbits." But the Explorer stops. Just which includes the Butterfly has no practical experience of machines and the subtending ideas, the Butterfly would have basically no practical experience with "orbit." An orbit assumes a round globe, and the Butterfly would likely image the globe as flat. Additional, "orbit" entails a notion of falling under gravity, but never hitting the ground, a idea complicated for even contemporary man.

And the existence of "orbits" would conflict with the Butterfly idea of a wonderful dome. Mankind itself necessary centuries to set that notion aside. The Explorer figured he could possibly not reside extended adequate to disabuse the Butterfly of a belief in a dome.

So the Explorer does not deflect the Butterfly from picturing the planet as surrounded by a dome.

Permit's continue Additional.

Butterfly: "How does the terrific machine speak to you about the stars?"

Explorer: "It sends us photographs."

Butterfly: "Photographs?"

Explorer, referring to an archeological web page nearby: "Photos are which includes paintings. Have you observed paintings on the walls of the caves to the East?"

Butterfly: "Yes, they are intriguing. So the excellent machine sends you paintings. How?

The Explorer thinks. He develops an analogy. "Do you know how the spider spins a net?"

Butterfly: "Yes, undoubtedly, these webs are of excellent danger."

Explorer: "Do you hear how the bats emit higher sounds at evening?"

Butterfly: "We can detect them faintly, and we know also these sounds are danger."

Explorer: "Then this is how we acquire the photos. The fantastic machine in the sky uses sounds including the bat to send signals to an animal which includes a spider, which then uses the substances in its physique to paint photographs."

Okay, now we have the analogy to top all analogies. The universe of the Explorer is 1 of excellent electromagnetic waves, of boundless frequencies and energies, traveling huge distances across billion of years. The computer systems of the Explorer method trillions of directions a second, creating photographs with millions of pixels of detail.

It is that electromagnetism and these computer systems that definitely permit the Hubble Telescope to communicate photographs. But the Explorer realizes, as prior to, the conceptual limitations of the Butterfly.

Therefore, the Explorer reduces electromagnetism and computer systems down to sound and spider webs, to accommodate the conceptual limitations of the Butterfly.

Truth Gap: Mankind as Butterfly

Now allow us step up 1 level. Allow's leave the gap among the Explorer and the Butterfly. Permit us now contemplate the gap in between the truth (once more, about any excellent notion you such as, be it God, or the universe, or the which means of life) and Mankind.

How complicated is the truth? We do not have any idea. We can not, due to the fact we are on a journey towards the truth, but never know how extended the journey is.

So there might be a very substantial gap among the truth and Mankind, a gap sufficiently big that Mankind does not now even have the intellectual or conceptual capability to grasp the truth.

Think just a handful of centuries ago. Calculus was unknown. Devoid of the ideas of calculus (and other comparable sophisticated math), Einstein might not have created Basic Relativity, nor Schrodinger the physics of Quantum Mechanics. So clearly the ideas of math had been expected as foundations for sophisticated physics.

Although Common Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are complicated, God, the nature of consciousness, the creation of existence, and a host of other concepts are definitely deeper and broader. What ideas could be essential prior to we can even effectively discuss the concepts?

So Mankind may be including the Butterfly, considering about the globe in convoluted analogies inside a restricted conceptual framework. Mankind should be humble, realizing that not only may we have not found the truth; we could not even have found the ideas required to recognize the truth.

All we know might be crude analogies for what is the ultimate Truth.

David Mascone has degrees in Engineering and Business. He has interests in science, philosophy and theology. His leisure activities contain sports, hiking, science fiction and tiny league umpiring. His intellectual concentrate is obtaining consistency and synergies in between the terrific masterpieces of human intellect, like religion, science and art.

No comments:

Post a Comment